MUSIGA warns musicians against glorifying online fraud after Shatta Wale’s ShattaFest remarks.
MUSIGA has cautioned musicians against appearing to encourage online fraud following Shatta Wale's controversial ShattaFest remarks, while defending the right to criticise corruption.

The Musicians Union of Ghana has urged artistes to avoid public statements that could be interpreted as promoting cybercrime, following controversial remarks by dancehall musician Shatta Wale. The union says musicians have the right to criticise corruption and perceived injustice but should not use their influence to excuse criminal activity.
ACCRA — The Musicians Union of Ghana (MUSIGA) has cautioned musicians against statements that could appear to encourage online fraud, following a controversy over comments made by dancehall artiste Shatta Wale at ShattaFest in Accra.
In a statement reported on Sunday, 25 October, and signed by its president, Bessa Simons, the union said musicians should exercise care when discussing internet fraud and other cyber-related offences, particularly when addressing young audiences.
The intervention follows Shatta Wale’s remarks at ShattaFest on 17 October 2026, during which he criticised what he described as unequal treatment of suspected fraudsters and public officials accused of corruption. His comments attracted criticism over whether they could be understood as encouraging fraudulent activity.
MUSIGA’s response raises a wider debate about artistic expression, public accountability and the responsibility of influential entertainers.
What did MUSIGA say?
MUSIGA acknowledged that musicians have a legitimate role in discussing unemployment, governance, corruption and the administration of justice.
However, the union warned against public statements that could normalise fraudulent conduct, glorify suspected offenders or discourage cooperation with lawful investigations.
It identified internet fraud, money laundering, romance scams and identity theft among the activities that musicians should avoid appearing to endorse. The union argued that cybercrime harms victims, undermines legitimate digital businesses and damages Ghana’s international reputation.
Its statement was directed at musicians generally, although it specifically referred to the controversy involving Shatta Wale. MUSIGA did not announce disciplinary sanctions against the artiste in the reports reviewed by Nukunya.
What did Shatta Wale say at ShattaFest?
Shatta Wale made the disputed remarks during his ShattaFest performance at the Accra Sports Stadium on 17 October.
According to reporting by Daily Graphic and MyJoyOnline, the musician rejected suggestions that his wealth came from fraud, attributing his success to his music career.
He also said he knew people involved in fraudulent activities but would not report them.
During the performance, he criticised what he regarded as selective enforcement of the law, arguing that young people suspected of financial crime were pursued while public officials accused of corruption appeared to escape comparable scrutiny.
One passage of his remarks was interpreted by critics as encouraging people to engage in fraud.
That interpretation became a central part of the subsequent controversy.
However, the broader context of his comments also included criticism of corruption and the justice system.
Both aspects are relevant to an accurate account of the incident.
The difference between criticism and endorsement
The controversy illustrates an important distinction.
Criticising the fairness of criminal investigations or calling for equal treatment under the law is different from encouraging people to commit crimes.
A musician may question whether enforcement agencies apply consistent standards without endorsing the offences being investigated.
Similarly, a public statement may attract criticism for appearing to excuse unlawful conduct without automatically meeting the legal requirements for criminal liability.
MUSIGA’s position is that entertainers should maintain that distinction when addressing audiences.
The union’s warning is an expression of professional concern, not a court ruling.
Interactive: distinguish the claims and evidence
Select a reporting issue to see what the available account establishes. This is an editorial evidence guide, not a legal determination.
Remarks at ShattaFest
Published reports attribute the disputed remarks to Shatta Wale’s 17 October performance. The reporting should remain attributed to those sources.
Why is MUSIGA concerned about young audiences?
Popular musicians can communicate with large audiences through concerts, interviews, recordings and social media.
Their public statements may reach people beyond their immediate fan communities.
MUSIGA argues that this visibility creates a responsibility to avoid messaging that could make criminal conduct appear acceptable.
The union also highlighted the consequences of cybercrime for victims and businesses.
Internet fraud can involve financial losses, misuse of personal information and deception targeting individuals or organisations.
However, Nukunya has not established evidence that Shatta Wale’s particular remarks caused anyone to engage in fraudulent activity.
Claims about direct behavioural influence would require evidence beyond the existence of the public controversy.
The wider cybercrime issue in Ghana
Ghana’s digital economy depends on trust in electronic payments, online businesses and communications.
Fraud and identity-related offences can undermine that trust and impose costs on victims and service providers.
The Cyber Security Authority is among the institutions responsible for addressing cybersecurity risks and supporting public awareness.
A reliable assessment of the scale of cybercrime requires official figures that identify the reporting period, type of incident and whether monetary losses are reported, verified or recovered.
Nukunya has not independently reconciled a complete official dataset for 2026.
For that reason, this report does not present an unverified national cybercrime loss figure or attribute changes in fraud levels to entertainment-industry commentary.
The scale of the problem should be examined through independently verifiable official statistics rather than assumptions about celebrity influence.
Interactive: cybercrime data verification checklist
Explore the information needed before publishing a national cybercrime statistic. This checklist does not represent a completed audit of Ghana’s 2026 data.
Select the criteria you want to examine.
What does this mean for Ghana’s music industry?
MUSIGA’s intervention places professional conduct and public communication at the centre of a broader industry discussion.
Musicians increasingly use their platforms to address political and economic issues.
Such engagement can contribute to public debate and draw attention to concerns that might otherwise receive limited coverage.
At the same time, public comments can create reputational risks when audiences interpret them differently from their intended meaning.
Artist managers, promoters and professional associations may therefore need to consider how musicians are prepared for interviews, live performances and online interactions.
Possible measures include communication training, clear guidance on sensitive subjects and procedures for responding to public criticism.
These are professional risk-management measures, not substitutes for freedom of expression.
MUSIGA calls for lawful opportunities for young people
Beyond its warning, the union encouraged musicians to promote productive opportunities for young people.
It identified employment, digital-skills development, financial literacy and entrepreneurship as areas where entertainers could use their public influence positively.
That approach moves the discussion beyond whether a particular statement was appropriate.
It raises the question of how the creative industry can contribute to public awareness about legitimate economic opportunities.
However, the union’s statement did not establish a new funded training programme or announce specific employment targets.
Its proposals should therefore be described as recommendations rather than implemented initiatives.
Interactive: areas highlighted by MUSIGA
Employment
Encouraging awareness of legitimate employment opportunities and routes into work.
These are illustrative areas of activity, not confirmed MUSIGA-funded programmes.
Has any action been taken against Shatta Wale?
The reports reviewed for this article do not establish that MUSIGA has imposed a disciplinary penalty on Shatta Wale over the ShattaFest remarks.
Nor do they establish that a court has ruled his comments unlawful.
The union issued a public warning about statements that could be interpreted as encouraging criminal activity.
That is distinct from a formal criminal investigation, prosecution or conviction.
Nukunya has not obtained a fresh response from Shatta Wale or his representatives specifically addressing MUSIGA’s 25 October statement.
His position should not be inferred solely from earlier remarks about the justice system.
Artistic freedom and public responsibility must coexist
MUSIGA’s intervention highlights a difficult but important question for Ghana’s entertainment industry.
Musicians are entitled to discuss unemployment, corruption, law enforcement and the conduct of public officials.
Their influence can make those discussions more visible.
But the public impact of their statements also makes clarity important, particularly when discussing crimes that cause financial and emotional harm.
The answer is not to prevent musicians from addressing controversial issues.
It is to distinguish legitimate criticism of institutions from language that audiences may reasonably interpret as excusing unlawful conduct.
For professional associations, the challenge is to provide clear and consistent standards without treating every controversial opinion as misconduct.
The ShattaFest controversy is ultimately a test of whether Ghana’s music industry can protect artistic expression while encouraging responsible public communication and recognising the real harm caused by cybercrime.









