TraffiTech-GH: First Speed-Camera Results, 2,151 Road Deaths and the Test Ahead
Mahama promises to measure TraffiTech-GH against road deaths after cameras catch drivers above 130 km/h. Nukunya analyses the evidence, missing data and motorists' rights.

Ghana’s TraffiTech-GH speed cameras recorded vehicles travelling faster than 130 km/h in 50 km/h zones during their first day of operation. President John Mahama now says the programme will be judged against road-crash figures from previous years — an important test, because early ticket counts alone cannot establish whether automated enforcement saves lives.
ACCRA — The Ghana Police Service activated TraffiTech-GH on 1 November after postponing an earlier October launch. The first days have brought extreme speeding detections, warnings about fraudulent payment notices, objections from commercial drivers and a presidential promise to assess the road-safety impact. Only the speeding module is currently active; red-light and illegal-parking enforcement are planned for a later phase.
TraffiTech-GH: What the First Results Reveal
Extreme speeding, electronic notices and early crash comparisons are drawing attention. But do the numbers establish safer roads?
Editorial reporting snapshot: 5 November 2026
President promises a road-safety comparison
Speaking to the Presidential Press Corps on 5 November, President Mahama urged motorists to give the system time. He said the government would compare crash figures month by month against the corresponding periods in 2025.
The president cited 2,151 road deaths in 2025, including 474 pedestrian fatalities. These are figures stated by the president, not independently reconciled here against the National Road Safety Authority’s final annual dataset.
Nukunya calculation: 474 ÷ 2,151 × 100 = 22.04%, rounded to 22.0%.
These figures show the scale of the road-safety problem. They do not establish how many deaths were caused by speeding, occurred on camera corridors or could have been prevented.
What the cameras detected
ACP Alexander Kwaku Obeng, the MTTD project coordinator, reported vehicles exceeding 130 km/h on roads with posted 50 km/h speed limits.
Reported locations included stretches around Boundary Road, School Junction, Mallam and Kasoa. Police said electronic notices were sent to registered owners with photographic or video evidence.
How much faster than the posted limit?
Police reported speeds greater than 130 km/h. Accordingly, the reported examples exceeded the limit by more than 80 km/h, more than 160%, or more than 2.6 times the limit. The initial calculator values are lower thresholds, not exact measured speeds. Slider adjustments are hypothetical.
Thousands of offences — but how many vehicles?
In a subsequent radio interview, ACP Obeng described first-day offences as numbering in the thousands but did not give a precise audited count.
Reported caution notices
Electronic warnings reportedly sent before enforcement began.
Reported offences
No precise independently audited first-day offence count supplied.
Pre-launch warnings are distinct from payable penalties. Adding the two counts would misrepresent the scale of enforcement.
Police have not publicly supplied a complete, independently auditable dataset showing vehicles monitored, unique vehicles cited, camera-hours, cancelled notices or successful challenges.
Without these denominators, a valid speeding offence rate cannot be calculated. High ticket numbers could reflect high offending, high traffic volumes, more active cameras or some combination of these.
Can TraffiTech-GH already claim fewer crashes?
Police officials have associated preparatory warnings and education with reported September year-on-year reductions in crashes and deaths.
Reported change in crashes
Year-on-year comparison cited by police.
Reported change in deaths
Year-on-year comparison cited by police.
September preceded the 1 November enforcement launch. September’s changes cannot be attributed to penalties imposed after enforcement began.
Weather, traffic volume, road works, enforcement elsewhere and ordinary statistical variation may affect monthly totals.
A more robust evaluation would compare matched camera and non-camera corridors over time, adjust for traffic exposure, examine serious injuries and fatalities separately, and report uncertainty. Month-on-month comparison is a useful starting point, but does not establish causation by itself.
Why some commercial drivers oppose the rollout
Commercial transport unions have criticised enforcement conditions and raised concerns about roadside trading, blocked bus stops and the potential burden of penalties.
These objections are not evidence that speed cameras are inaccurate. The government says the current system targets speeding, while other offences remain subject to existing enforcement arrangements.
Transparent consultation, reliable speed-limit signage and an accessible appeals process will be important to fair enforcement.
How to check a fine without falling for a scam
In an advisory issued on 4 November and reported on 5 November, the Ghana Police Service urged motorists to verify notices before paying.
Check the reported official sender ID: GPS-MTTD.
Verify the vehicle registration, location, date and time.
Review available photographic or video evidence.
Do not transfer money to personal mobile-money numbers.
Use only a payment or contest route verified through current official police guidance.
Online platform: traffitech-ghpay.nib.com.gh
Police-listed USSD route: *710*0#
These routes are reproduced from the supplied reporting and should be independently checked against current Ghana Police Service guidance before making a payment.
Reported payment or contest period
Generally counted from notice issuance.
Reported late-payment charge
Percentage of the original fine after the deadline.
The actual offence tariff is governed by the relevant legal schedules; there is no single universal fine amount established here. Police say registered owners may be liable even where another person was driving, making accurate DVLA ownership records important.
Five datasets the authorities should publish
01 — Vehicles monitored by corridor and camera-hour
Would establish enforcement coverage and the denominator needed to calculate offence rates.
02 — Verified notices, cancellations and upheld appeals
Would help evaluate evidence quality, error correction and procedural fairness.
03 — Speed distributions before and after activation
Would help establish whether driving behaviour is changing.
04 — Fatal and serious-injury crashes by corridor
Would support evaluation of road-safety outcomes rather than relying only on fines.
05 — Procurement, costs, fine receipts and allocation
Would allow scrutiny of public expenditure, financial incentives and revenue allocation.
Some commentary has cited a multiyear contract value and proposed revenue-sharing arrangements. These have not been verified against a complete official contract and Ministry of Finance disclosure for this article.
Publishing the signed agreement and audited financial flows would allow a more reliable assessment. No unverified contract amounts are presented here as established facts.
The test is safer roads, not more fines
TraffiTech-GH offers a potentially important shift towards evidence-based road enforcement. Its success should be judged by sustained reductions in excessive speeds, serious injuries and deaths, alongside fair appeals, accurate records and transparent reporting.
The first five days establish that police reported detecting extreme speeding and issuing notices. They do not yet establish a measurable reduction in road casualties.









